My Assignment Help

HI6026 Audit and Assurance: Tutorial Questions 1 Assignment Answer

Assessment Task – Tutorial Questions

Unit Code: HI6026

Unit Name: Audit, Assurance and Compliance Assignment: Tutorial Questions 1

Weighting: 25%

Total Assignment Marks: 50 marks

Purpose: This assignment is designed to assess your level of knowledge of the key topics covered in this unit

Unit Learning Outcomes Assessed:

1. Demonstrate an understanding of the reporting requirements and auditing standards;
2. Demonstrate an understanding of the auditor's professional, legal and ethical responsibilities to
their clients and third parties;
3. Identify the elements of the financial report audit process;
4. Understand the audit planning procedures, evaluate the business risk and assess the internal control;
5. Prepare auditing procedures for transactions and balances by conducting control and substantive
tests;
6. Understand the auditor’s reporting obligations.

Description: Each week students were provided with three tutorial questions of varying degrees of difficulty. These tutorial questions are available in the Tutorial Folder for each week on Blackboard. The Interactive Tutorials are designed to assist students with the process, skills and knowledge to answer the provided tutorial questions. Your task is to answer a selection of tutorial questions for weeks 1 to 5 inclusive and submit these answers in a single document.

The questions to be answered are:

Week 1

You are the audit manager of Overseas Explorer Ltd (OEL), which acquired the small proprietary company Local Pty Ltd (Local) on 30 June 2018. The price of the acquisition was agreed at $5 million, on the condition that OEL is satisfied with the financial records of Local. As Local is a small proprietary company, it has not prepared statutory financial reports or undergone an audit since its incorporation in 2016. However, Local has agreed to allow your firm, which is the auditor of OEL, to access its books and records. The CEO of OEL, Wendy Champion, has requested that your firm provide assurance on the following three items:

  • The management accounts for the year ended 30 June 2017
  • All transactions occurring from the date negotiations commenced until the settlement date, to ensure that all transactions were within the normal course of operations
  • The financial report prepared at the acquisition date of 30 June 2018

In order to clarify your responsibilities, you requested that OEL indicate the level of assurance that they require for each item. Wendy replied that the financial report as at acquisition date is very important, as are the transactions since negotiations commenced, but that she is willing to have less work done on the previous year’s management accounts.

Required:

Indicate the type of engagement that will most likely be undertaken for each of the three tasks and the level of assurance to be provided. Explain your selections. (10 marks)

Week 2

You have been the auditor of Data Ltd for two years. Your auditor’s report for Data for the year ended 30 June 2018 was unmodified, indicating that in your opinion the financial report gave a true and fair view. In August 2018, Data obtained a large loan from Better Bank Ltd, to provide additional working capital. Subsequently Data suffered severe trading difficulties and was placed into liquidation in late December 2018, with insufficient funds to repay the loan to Better Bank.

Required:

Outline a defense for your audit firm to any legal action taken by Better Bank to recover its loss. (10 marks)

You are an audit manager at Hall & Associates, who have been approached to conduct the audit of Computer Games Ltd (CGL), a manufacturer of interactive computer games, for the year ended 30 June 2013.

Hall & Associates has not previously audited CGL’s financial report, although it has undertaken other types of engagements for CGL. Last year CGL hired Hall & Associates to assist in the redesign of CGL’s accounting software to ensure that internal controls over internet sales were adequate to ensure the confidentiality of customer data and accuracy of recording. The new software was implemented at the beginning of the current year and appears to be working satisfactorily. As part of this year’s audit, you expect to review the internal controls at CGL, including the controls within the IT systems.

As part of CGL’s financing arrangements with its bank, Easymoney Ltd, it has a loan covenant that stipulates that the quick asset ratio cannot be less than 1:1 or Easymoney Ltd has the right to withdraw all funding. The board has advised you that CGL’s quick asset ratiois currently at 0.9:1 due to industrial action holding up the sale of goods imported from overseas. The board has asked you to ignore this temporary breach of the loan covenant, explaining that CGL is a stable and financially sound company, and that the ratio will return to a positive level on resolution of the industrial dispute. The board has indicated that unnecessarily disclosing this within the audit report would force it to reconsider its plans to use your audit firm for other engagements.

As a result of CGL’s current cash flow difficulties, the board has requested that Hall & Associate’s audit fee for 2013 be paid in CGL shares. The board has indicated that the market value of the shares will equate to the value of the audit fee charged by Hall & Associates.

The management of CGL is currently reviewing the structure of its audit committee to ensure that it complies with the requirements of the ASX Corporate Governance Principles and Recommendations. However, the board is confused by the reference in the ASX Corporate Governance Principles and Recommendations to both independent directors and non-executive directors, as they thought that they were the same thing. As a result, they have sought your advice concerning the structure of their audit committee.

Required:

  1. Identify and explain three separate key threats to Hall & Associates’ independence that may arise under APES 110. (3 marks)
  2. For each independence threat identified in a) above, describe the course of action Hall & Associates needs to take to ensure compliance with APES 110. (7 marks)

You are the audit senior responsible for the audit of Sampson Limited. You are currently planning the audit for the year ended 31 December 20X7. During your initial planning meeting held with the financial controller, he told you of the following changes in the company’s operations.

  1. Due to the financial controller’s workload, the company has employed a treasurer. The financial controller is excited about the appointment because in the two months that the treasurer has been with the company he has realised a small profit for the company through foreign-exchange transactions in yen.
  2. Sampson has planned to close an inefficient factory in country New South Wales before the end of 20X7. It is expected that the redeployment and disposal of the factory’s assets will not be completed until the end of the following year. However, the financial controller is confident that he will be able to determine reasonably accurate closure provisions.
  3. To help achieve the budgeted sales for the year, Sampson is about to introduce bonuses for its sales staff. The bonuses will be an increasing percentage of the gross sales made, by each salesperson, above certain monthly targets.
  4. The company is using a new general ledger software package. The financial controller is impressed with the new system, because management accounts are easily produced and allow detailed comparisons with budgets and prior-period figures across product lines and geographical areas. The conversion to the new system occurred with a minimum of fuss. As it is a popular computer package, it required only minor modifications.
  5. As part of the conversion, the position of systems administrator was created. This position is responsible for all systems maintenance, including data backups and modifications. These tasks were the responsibility of the accountant.

Required:

For each of the scenarios above, explain how the components of audit risk (inherent, control or detection risk) are affected. (10 marks)

Week 5

The following financial ratios have been calculated for Nova Ltd for the year ended 30 June 2008:


Actual
results
Budgeted
results
Previous yearIndustry average
Current ratio1.971.921.871.92
Quick asset ratio1.061.061.061.11
Inventory turnover4.214.914.864.76
Net profit ratio0.050.030.030.03
Gross margin0.650.590.610.61

Required:

Provide four (4) possible explanations for the results for the various ratios for Solar Ltd and outline their implications for the audit. (10 marks)

Answer

Audit and assurance

Week 1

Types of Assurance Engagements

An engagement wherein auditor provides assurance over the given subject matters by examining them against specific criteria to the intended users is known as assurance engagement. The party responsible for providing the subject matter is known as the responsible party and it is different from the intended users for which the assurance engagement is carried out. Every assurance engagement has specific purpose and procedures attached to it. 2 types of assurance may be provided by the auditors in the assurance engagement. One is reasonable assurance and the other is limited assurance (Leung, et al. 2019).

As per the provided information, Overseas Explorer Ltd (OEL) has acquired Local Pty Ltd (Local) on the condition that OEL is satisfied with its financial records. Although Local has not undergone any audit since its incorporation. Following are the types of engagement that may be carried out for providing assurance to OEL on given matters:

  • Management accounts of the previous year

As CEO of OEL has specified that she wants to have less work done on management accounts of the previous year, the scope of engagement becomes limited. The auditor of OEL has a responsibility to review the management accounts with the set of procedures decided in consultation with the management or CEO of the company. In this matter, an auditor will only be able to provide a limited level of assurance (Schmidt, Wood, & Grabski, 2016).

  • Transactions affected in Local from the negotiation commencement till the settlement date

OEL needs to have a track over the transaction affected in Local from the negotiation commencement until the settlement date because there are chances that Local will try to show a better position than the real one. An understanding of these transactions will also help OEL to ascertain the efficiency of the Local's internal control system. The auditor may carry out an internal audit of Local to provide an assurance to the OEL. The assurance that will be provided by the auditor shall be reasonable (Simetinger, 2018).

  • Financial Reports of the current year

The financial reports of Local show the performance and actual financial position of the company. So an auditor needs to perform a detailed financial audit that shall be following relevant standards and principles of the audit. The value of Local will be determined based on the figures in its financial report, so the auditor must provide a reasonable assurance in this regard. 

Week 5

Ratio Analysis

Ratio analysis is done with an aim to ascertain the financial performance and position of the given entity. It is used to compare the performance of an entity in the given period with the performance of the past year. By this, comparisons may be made with the entity's budgeted results and industry's average results (Sheppard, 2018). Every ratio tells a different story about the performance and position of the entity.

Current Ratio

Current ratio tells about the ability of the entity to pay off its current obligations. Short term liquidity and solvency may also be evaluated by the help of the current ratio. The current ratio(s) for Nova Ltd have been provided hereunder.

Ratio
Actual Results
Budgeted Results
Previous Year
Industry Average
Current Ratio
1.97
1.92
1.87
1.92

 The auditor may observe that current ratio of the company is higher in the present year when compared with budgeted results, the industry's average, and previous year's current ratio. Additionally, the current ratio of the present year is near to 2 which is considered as an ideal ratio (Elliott, 2018)

Quick Asset Ratio

Quick asset ratio tells about the ability of the entity to pay off its current obligations by realising its quick assets. Quick assets comprise all those assets that are easily convertible in cash. The quick ratio(s) for Nova Ltd have been hereunder (O'Donnell, et al. 2010).

Ratio
Actual Results
Budgeted Results
Previous Year
Industry Average
Quick Asset Ratio
1.06
1.06
1.06
1.11

 An auditor may observe that the quick asset ratio of the entity is the same in actual results, budgeted, and the previous year. However, the quick ratio of the present year is lower than the industry's average. This indicates that the entity has sufficient liquidity to pay its current obligations.

Inventory turnover

Inventory turnover tells about the momentum of goods sold in any entity. It tells about the number of times the inventory got replaced. The inventory turnover(s) for Nova Ltd has been hereunder.

Ratio
Actual Results
Budgeted Results
Previous Year
Industry Average
Inventory Turnover
4.21
4.91
4.91
4.76

The auditor may observe that Nova Ltd has sold its average goods 4.21 times in a year. However, the performance is not as per expectations (Elliott, 2015).

Net Profit Ratio

Net Profit Ratio tells about the profitability available for shareholders from the revenue of the entity. The net profit ratio(s) for Nova Ltd has been hereunder.

Ratio
Actual Results
Budgeted Results
Previous Year
Industry Average
Net Profit Ratio
0.05
0.03
0.03
0.03

The auditor may observe that the company has earned an impressive amount of profits in the present year as the figure is higher than the company's budgeted, previous year and industry's average results (Leung, et al. 2015).

Customer Testimonials