- Home
- Free Samples
- Cost Accounting
- ACC2005 Process Costing And Activity ...
ACC2005 Process Costing and Activity Based Costing System Assessment Answer

ACC2005
Semester 1 2020 - Management Accounting Assignment Weighting = 30%
1. Process Costing and Activity Based Costing System (20 Marks)
Technicians at Coastal Radiology Queensland (CRQ) conduct X-rays, ultrasounds, computed- tomography (CT) scans and magnetic resonance imaging (MRI). The management accountant has gathered the following information in preparation for the budget for the year to 30 June 2019. The costing system that management is using at CRQ has one cost driver, technicians’ remuneration, and costs are calculated per procedure. The management accountant is not sure that the system is reporting sufficiently accurate costs on which to base charges or to monitor performance.
X-rays | Ultrasounds | CT scans | MRI | Indirect costs | |
Technicians’ remuneration | 120 000 | 180 000 | 220 000 | 250 000 | |
Depreciation | 55 000 | 45 000 | 865 000 | 1 650 000 | |
Consumables | 41 500 | 31 500 | 42 000 | 57 000 | |
Administration | 380 000 | ||||
Maintenance | 565 000 | ||||
Cleaning | 454 500 | ||||
Utilities | 247 000 | ||||
Number of procedures | 3720 | 4535 | 2780 | 3520 | |
Duration of procedure in minutes | 5 | 15 | 20 | 25 | |
Post-procedure cleaning time in minutes | 5 | 5 | 10 | 15 |
Required
- Apply the costing system in use at CRQ to calculate a cost per procedure.
- Evaluate the costing system as a basis for charging patients and for monitoring performance.
- Recommend a costing system that is capable of addressing issues raised in your evaluation. Note: apply the system that you have recommended.
- ‘There’s no reason for me to get excited about the choice between the weighted-average and FIFO methods in my process-costing system. I have long-term contracts with my materials suppliers at fixed prices.’ Do you agree with this statement made by a plant controller? Explain your answer.
2. Process Costing (10 marks)
Polk Company manufactures basketball. Materials are added at the beginning of the production process and conversion costs are incurred uniformly. Production and cost data for the month of July 2017 are as follows:
Production Data – Basketballs | Units | Percentage Complete | |
Work in Process units, July 1 | 500 | 60% | |
Units started in production | 1000 | ||
Work in process units, July 31 | 600 | 40% | |
Cost Data – Basketballs | |||
Work in Process , July 1 | |||
Materials | $750 | ||
Conversion Costs | $600 | $1350 | |
Direct materials | $2400 | ||
Direct Labor | $1580 | ||
Manufacturing overhead | $1240 | ||
Instructions |
(a) Calculate the following:
- The equivalent units of production for materials and conversion costs
- The unit costs of production for material and conversion costs
- The assignment of costs to units transferred out and in process at the end of the accounting period
(b) Prepare a production report for the month of July for the basketballs.
Answer
1. Process Costing and Activity Based Costing System
1. Apply the costing system in use at CRQ to calculate a cost per procedure.
Answer:
The cost driver is remuneration. Thus all the indirect are allocated to the services on the basis of remuneration.
Cost per procedure is as follows:
X-rays | Ultrasounds | CT scans | MRI | Indirect costs | Total | |
Technicians’ remuneration | 120,000 | 180,000 | 220,000 | 250,000 | 770,000 | |
Depreciation | 55,000 | 45,000 | 865,000 | 1,650,000 | 2,615,000 | |
Consumables | 41,500 | 31,500 | 42,000 | 57,000 | 172,000 | |
Administration | 380,000 | 380,000 | ||||
Maintenance | 565,000 | 565,000 | ||||
Cleaning | 454,500 | 454,500 | ||||
Utilities | 247,000 | 247,000 | ||||
Number of procedures | 3720 | 4535 | 2780 | 3520 | 14,555 | |
Duration of procedure in minutes | 5 | 15 | 20 | 25 | 65 | |
Post-procedure cleaning time in minutes | 5 | 5 | 10 | 15 | 35 | |
% of remuneration to total remuneration | 15.58% | 23.38% | 28.57% | 32.47% | 0.00% | 100.00% |
Allocation of Indirect costs | ||||||
Administration | 59,221 | 88,831 | 108,571 | 123,377 | 380,000 | |
Maintenance | 88,052 | 132,078 | 161,429 | 183,442 | 565,000 | |
Cleaning | 70,831 | 106,247 | 129,857 | 147,565 | 454,500 | |
Utilities | 38,494 | 57,740 | 70,571 | 80,195 | 247,000 | |
Total cost of each service | 473,097 | 641,396 | 1,597,429 | 2,491,578 | 5,203,500 | |
Cost per Procedure | $127.18 | $141.43 | $574.61 | $707.83 |
2. Evaluate the costing system as a basis for charging patients and for monitoring performance.
Answer:
The organization uses single cost driver method to allocate the indirect costs. The single cost driver is technicians’ remuneration. The system is not very appropriate because not all costs are necessarily driven by the technicians’ remuneration. There might be different cost drivers for different costs. The cost will not be allocated appropriately (ORCSRice University, n.d.)
In order to allocate cost more appropriately it is important to find out the appropriate cost driver for the cost. The administration cost will be related to the duration of each procedure. The maintenance cost is driven by the no of procedures carried out. Cleaning cost to the pot-procedure cleaning time and utilities cost can be related to the consumables cost in each department more appropriately.
3. Recommend a costing system that is capable of addressing issues raised in your evaluation. Note: apply the system that you have recommended.
Answer:
Another method to allocate the indirect overheads more appropriately is the Activity Based Costing System. The ABC costing system uses different cost drives for different cost pools and distributes cost based upon the most appropriate cost driver. ABC system is more process driven (ORCSRice University, n.d.)
The cost using the ABC system is calculated as follows:
X-rays | Ultrasounds | CT scans | MRI | Indirect costs | Total | |
Technicians’ remuneration | 120,000 | 180,000 | 220,000 | 250,000 | 770,000 | |
Depreciation | 55,000 | 45,000 | 865,000 | 1,650,000 | 2,615,000 | |
Consumables | 41,500 | 31,500 | 42,000 | 57,000 | 172,000 | |
Administration | 380,000 | 380,000 | ||||
Maintenance | 565,000 | 565,000 | ||||
Cleaning | 454,500 | 454,500 | ||||
Utilities | 247,000 | 247,000 | ||||
Number of procedures | 3720 | 4535 | 2780 | 3520 | 14,555 | |
Duration of procedure in minutes | 5 | 15 | 20 | 25 | 65 | |
Post-procedure cleaning time in minutes | 5 | 5 | 10 | 15 | 35 | |
Total Duration of procedures | 18600 | 68025 | 55600 | 88000 | 230,225 | |
total Post-procedure cleaning time in minutes | 18600 | 22675 | 27800 | 52800 | 121,875 | |
Allocation of Indirect costs | ||||||
Administration | 30,700 | 112,279 | 91,771 | 145,249 | 380,000 | |
Maintenance | 144,404 | 176,041 | 107,915 | 136,640 | 565,000 | |
Cleaning | 69,364 | 84,560 | 103,673 | 196,903 | 454,500 | |
Utilities | 59,596 | 45,235 | 60,314 | 81,855 | 247,000 | |
Total cost of each service | 520,564 | 674,616 | 1,490,672 | 2,517,648 | 5,203,500 | |
Cost per Procedure | $139.94 | $148.76 | $536.21 | $715.24 |
Cost pool | Amount | Cost driver | Total quantity of cost driver | Allocation Rate (per unit of cost driver) |
Administration | 380,000 | Duration of Procedures | 230,225 | $ 1.65 |
Maintenance | 565,000 | No of procedures | 14,555 | $ 38.82 |
Cleaning | 454,500 | Post-procedure cleaning time | 121,875 | $ 3.73 |
Utilities | 247,000 | Consumables | 172,000 | $ 1.44 |
The system allocates the cost more accurately and can help in better pricing of services and evaluation of performance. However the success of the method depends upon selection of the right cost driver.
4. ‘There’s no reason for me to get excited about the choice between the weighted-average and FIFO methods in my process-costing system. I have long-term contracts with my materials suppliers at fixed prices.’ Do you agree with this statement made by a plant controller? Explain your answer.
Answer:
No I do not agree with the statement because materials is the only one small part of cost in process. Conversion cost which includes the labor and overheads is also there. The use of weighted average and FIFO method does not affect only the cost of material but also the cost of units produced and transferred.
FIFO method calculates the cost of units in the process based upon the total cost incurred during the period and the total no of equivalent units completed in the period. The cost of beginning work in process units is assigned to the first completed units and then to the equivalent units introduced and worked on during the period. The weighted average method calculates the average cost per unit by adding the total transferred - in cost to the process by the total transferred - in units completed. Thus the methods costs the units completed and transferred out and ending work –in process at the average cost of units completed (Horngren, C.T., 2009 pp. 735).
Thus despite the same material cost the two methods of costing will give different cost of units produced.
Question 2 Process Costing
(a) Calculate the following:
1. The equivalent units of production for materials and conversion costs
Flow of production | Physical units | Equivalent Units | |
Materials | Conversion Cost | ||
Production Data – Basketballs | |||
Work in Process units, July | 500 | 500 | 300 |
Units started in production | 1000 | 1000 | 1000 |
Units to account for | 1500 | ||
Completed and transferred out | 900 | 900 | 900 |
Work in process units, July 31 | 600 | 600 | 240 |
Equivalent units of work done to date | 1500 | 1500 | 1140 |
2. The unit costs of production for material and conversion costs
Total production Cost | Materials | conversion Cost | |
Beginning work in process | $1,350.00 | $750.00 | $600.00 |
Incurred during the period | $5,220.00 | $2,400.00 | $2,820.00 |
Total Cost to account for: | $6,570.00 | $3,150.00 | $3,420.00 |
Equivalent Units | 1500.00 | 1500.00 | 1140.00 |
Cost per equivalent unit | $2.10 | $3.00 |
3. The assignment of costs to units transferred out and in process at the end of the accounting period
Total Cost | Materials | conversion Cost | |
Cost of unit transferred out | $4,590.00 | $1,890.00 | $2,700.00 |
Cost of ending inventory | $1,980.00 | $1,260.00 | $720.00 |
Total | $6,570.00 | $3,150.00 | $3,420.00 |
(b) Prepare a production report for the month of July for the basketballs.
Polk Company manufactures basketball | ||||
Production Report for the month of July 2017 | ||||
a. | Units to be accounted for: | Physicalunits | ||
Completed and transferred out | 900 | |||
Work in process units, July 31 | 600 | |||
1500 | ||||
b. | Equivalent units of production: | |||
Flow of production | Physical units | Equivalent Units | ||
Materials | Conversion Cost | |||
Work in Process units, July | 500 | 500 | 300 | |
Units started in production | 1000 | 1000 | 1000 | |
Units to account for | 1500 | |||
Completed and transferred out | 900 | 900 | 900 | |
Work in process units, July 31 | 600 | 600 | 240 | |
Equivalent units of work done to date | 1500 | 1500 | 1140 | |
c. | Cost per equivalent unit: | |||
Total production Cost | Materials | conversion Cost | ||
Beginning work in process | $1,350.00 | $750.00 | $600.00 | |
Incurred during the period | $5,220.00 | $2,400.00 | $2,820.00 | |
Total Cost to account for: | $6,570.00 | $3,150.00 | $3,420.00 | |
Equivalent Units | 1500.00 | 1500.00 | 1140.00 | |
Cost per equivalent unit | $2.10 | $3.00 | ||
d. | Average cost of units tranferred out and in ending invnetory | |||
Total Cost | Materials | conversion Cost | ||
Cost of unit transferred out | $4,590.00 | $1,890.00 | $2,700.00 | |
Cost of ending inventory | $1,980.00 | $1,260.00 | $720.00 | |
Total | $6,570.00 | $3,150.00 | $3,420.00 |
